Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51092
Title: | Feasibility of surface guided radiotherapy for patient positioning in breast radiotherapy versus conventional tattoo-based setups- a systematic review. | Authors: | Naidoo W.;Leech M. | Monash Health Department(s): | Rheumatology | Institution: | (Naidoo, Leech) Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland | Issue Date: | 16-Jun-2022 | Copyright year: | 2022 | Publisher: | Elsevier Ireland Ltd | Place of publication: | United Kingdom | Publication information: | Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology. 22(pp 39-49), 2022. Date of Publication: June 2022. | Journal: | Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology | Abstract: | Background: Traditionally tattoos are used for patient setup in radiotherapy. However they may pose challenges for the radiotherapists to achieve precise patient alignment, and serve as a permanent visual reminder of the patient's diagnosis and often challenging cancer journey. The psychological impact of tattoos has been recognized in recent years. The increasing complexity of treatment techniques and the utilization of hypofractionated regimes, requires an enhanced level of accuracy and safety. Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) enables improvements in the accuracy and reproducibility of patient isocentric and postural alignment, enhanced efficiency, and safety in breast radiotherapy. Purpose(s): The aim of this review was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of SGRT to conventional tattoo-based setups in free-breathing breast radiotherapy and to determine if SGRT can reduce the frequency of routine image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Material(s) and Method(s): A systematic literature review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Papers identified through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar database searches between 2010 and 2021, were critically appraised. Systematic, random, mean residual errors and 3D vector shifts as determined by IGRT verification were analysed. Result(s): A review of 13 full papers suggests SGRT improves the accuracy and reproducibility of patient setup in breast radiotherapy with consistent reductions in the residual errors. There appears to be a good correlation between SGRT setups and radiographic imaging. The frequency of IGRT and the corresponding dose could potentially be reduced. Additionally, SGRT improves treatment efficiency. Conclusion(s): SGRT appears to have improved the accuracy and reproducibility of patient setup and treatment efficiency of breast radiotherapy compared to conventional tattoo/laser-based method, with the potential to reduce the frequency of routine IGRT. The reliance on tattoos in breast radiotherapy are likely to become obsolete with positive implications for both patients and clinical practice.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s) | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.03.001 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51092 | Type: | Article | Subjects: | breast cancer cancer radiotherapy image guided radiotherapy proton therapy radiotherapist |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Systematic review and/or meta-analysis |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.