Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51401
Title: | Establishing a paediatric critical care core quality measure set using a multistakeholder, consensus-driven process | Authors: | Winderlich, Jacinta ;Allen M.;Schults J.;Charles K.;Millar J.;Rickard C;Chopra V;Gibbons K.;Long D.;Rahiman S.;Hutching K.;Spotswood N.;Secombe P.;Pizimolas G.;Tu Q.;Waak M.;McMullen B.;Hall L. | Monash Health Department(s): | Nutrition and Dietetics Allied Health Paediatric - Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care |
Institution: | (Winderlich) Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | Issue Date: | 25-Mar-2024 | Copyright year: | 2024 | Publication information: | Critical Care and Resuscitation. (no pagination) 2024. Date of Publication: 25 March 2024. | Journal: | Critical Care in Resuscitation | Abstract: | Introduction Monitoring healthcare quality is challenging in paediatric critical care due to measure variability, data collection burden, and uncertainty regarding consumer and clinician priorities. Objective We sought to establish a core quality measure set that (i) is meaningful to consumers and clinicians and (ii) promotes alignment of measure use and collection across paediatric critical care. Design We conducted a multi-stakeholder Delphi study with embedded consumer prioritisation survey. The Delphi involved two surveys, followed by a consensus meeting. Triangulation methods were used to integrate survey findings prior tobefore the consensus meeting. In the consensus panel, broad agreement was reached on a core measure set, and recommendations were made for future measurement directions in paediatric critical care. Setting and participants Australian and New Zealand paediatric critical care survivors (aged >18 years) and families were invited to rank measure priorities in an online survey distributed via social media and consumer groups. A concurrent Delphi study was undertaken with paediatric critical care clinicians, policy makers, and a consumer representative. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Priorities for quality measures. Results Respondents to the consumer survey (n = 117) identified (i) nurse-patient ratios; (ii) visible patient goals; and (iii) long-term follow-up as their quality measure priorities. In the Delphi process, clinicians (Round 1 n = 191; Round 2 n = 117 [61% retention]; Round 3 n = 14) and a consumer representative reached broad agreement on a 51-item (61% of 83 initial measures) core measure set. Clinician priorities were (i) nurse-patient ratio; (ii) staff turnover; and (iii) long term-follow up. Measure feasibility was rated low due to a perceived lack of standardised case definitions or data collection burden. Five recommendations were generated. Conclusion(s) We defined a 51-item core measurement set for paediatric critical care, aligned with clinician and consumer priorities. Next steps are implementation and methodological evaluation in quality programs, and where appropriate, retirement of redundant measures. | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.01.002 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51401 | Type: | Article | Subjects: | patient safety critical care |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Qualitative study |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.