Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51863
Conference/Presentation Title: Ravitch procedure vs nuss bar for repair of pectus excavatum-a meta-analysis.
Authors: Brookes J.;Anggata J.;Shah J.;Ma R.;Williams M. ;Vallely M.;Smith J. 
Monash Health Department(s): Cardiology (MonashHeart)
Institution: (Brookes, Anggata, Shah, Ma, Williams, Vallely, Smith) The Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Presentation/Conference Date: 31-May-2024
Copyright year: 2024
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Publication information: Heart Lung and Circulation. Conference: ANZSCTS Annual Scientific Meeting. Wellington New Zealand. 33(Supplement 1) (pp S26), 2024. Date of Publication: June 2024.
Journal: Heart Lung and Circulation
Abstract: Purpose: Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital chest wall deformity. Multiple strategies exist for the surgical correction of pectus, two of the most frequently used are the Ravitch procedure or Nuss bar insertion. However, little high-level research exists to compare the outcomes and resource utilisation of these two techniques. This meta-analysis sought to compare the outcomes of the two surgical approaches. Method(s): A meta-analysis was conducted searching five medical databases from inception to April 2023. Search terms were "pectus excavatum" AND ("Nuss" OR "Ravitch" OR "minimally invasive" OR "Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery" OR "minimally invasive" OR "Thoracotomy"). Randomised controlled trials, two-arm prospective, and two-arm retrospective cohort studies were eligible for inclusion. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Result(s): The literature search identified 5,947 potential studies. After removal of duplicate studies, and title, abstract and full text reviews 27 studies were eligible for inclusion. These studies included 7,379 patients; 5,520 undergoing Nuss bar insertion and 1,859 undergoing Ravitch procedures. There was no significant difference in post-operative length of stay between the two groups-Ravitch weighted mean average length of stay 6.19 days, compared to Nuss bar 6.14 days, standard mean difference -0.05 days (95% CI -1.57-1.47). Relative risk of re-operation was similar between Ravitch compared to Nuss bar (Relative Risk 0.71, 95% CI 0.32-1.57). Rates of infection also did not differ between the two groups (Relative Risk 1.15, 95% CI 0.66-1.99). Conclusion(s): Ravitch and Nuss bar correction of pectus excavatum are frequently performed procedures. This meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the hospital length of stay, need for reoperation or rates of infection between the two procedures. Both procedures may be undertaken with low rates of morbidity.Copyright © 2024
Conference Name: ANZSCTS Annual Scientific Meeting
Conference Start Date: 2023-11-09
Conference End Date: 2023-11-11
Conference Location: Wellington, New Zealand
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.04.070
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51863
Type: Conference Abstract
Subjects: funnel chest
thoracotomy
thorax deformity
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey)
Appears in Collections:Conference Abstracts

Show full item record

Page view(s)

142
checked on Sep 27, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.