Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52026
Conference/Presentation Title: PCR161 A qualitative study on respondents' interpretation of the EQ-VAS in Ethiopia.
Authors: Belay Y.B.;Mihalopoulos C.;Mulhern B.;Engel L.
Monash Health Department(s): Monash University - School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine
Institution: (Belay, Mihalopoulos, Engel) Monash Health Economics Group, School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(Mulhern) University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Presentation/Conference Date: 18-Jun-2024
Copyright year: 2024
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Publication information: Value in Health. Conference: ISPOR 2024. Atlanta United States. 27(6 Supplement) (pp S326), 2024. Date of Publication: June 2024.
Journal: Value in Health
Abstract: Objectives: To explore how the general public and people with physical and/or mental health problems use and interpret the EQ-VAS in Ethiopia. Method(s): In-depth interviews were conducted with general public and individuals with mental health conditions (anxiety and/or depression) or physical health conditions (heart failure and/or hypertension). The interviews, carried out in public settings and hospitals in Ethiopia, were transcribed in Amharic and analysed using NVivo. Content analysis was conducted for each participant group separately, with comparisons made using cross-case analysis. Result(s): The study involved 15 participants from the general public and 30 from a hospital setting. Findings were categorised into four codes, exploring views towards (1) ease of completion, (2) interpretation of health, (3) representation of a meaningful change on the 0-100 scale, and (4) best/worst imaginable health states. The majority of the general public found completing the EQ-VAS challenging due to lack of explanations for the scale's numbers, which was less not observed in participants with a health condition. General public often used past health as a benchmark and referred to past health conditions, while those with physical or mental health problems focused on their current health and use of medication. Respondents suggested using 5- or 10-point hash marks over the current 1-point, reflecting respondents' interpretation of a meaningful change on the EQ-VAS. Different interpretations for the best/worst imaginable health states were noted between the general public and individuals with a health condition. Achieving the best health state was considered unattainable by a few participants, with death infrequently mentioned as worst imaginable health state. Conclusion(s): This study provided further evidence related to the interpretation of the EQ-VAS and underscores the necessity for explanations of numbers. Further quantitative research is needed to examine what denotes a meaningful change on EQ-VAS across different disease areas.Copyright © 2024
Conference Name: ISPOR 2024
Conference Start Date: 2024-05-05
Conference End Date: 2024-05-08
Conference Location: Atlanta, United States
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.2040
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52026
Type: Conference Abstract
Subjects: anxiety
depression
heart failure
hypertension
mental deficiency
mental health
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Qualitative study
Appears in Collections:Conferences

Show full item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.