Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52547
Title: A content analysis of health library support for Australian medical training programs.
Authors: Griffith A.;Siemensma G.;Anderson, Alice ;Smith A.
Monash Health Department(s): Library Services
Institution: (Griffith) Library, Albury Wodonga Health, Albury, NSW; University of New South Wales, Rural Clinical Campus, Albury, NSW
(Siemensma) Library, Grampians Health, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
(Anderson) Library, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
(Smith) Library, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Issue Date: 18-Sep-2024
Copyright year: 2024
Publication information: Journal of Hospital Librarianship. (no pagination), 2024. Date of Publication: 18 Sep 2024.
Journal: Journal of Hospital Librarianship
Abstract: Health libraries play a critical role in supporting medical training in Australia. Accreditation is an important means of ensuring a program of study and the education provider suitably equips trainees with the knowledge, skills and professional attributes necessary to practice in the profession. This study identifies a lack of consistency and specificity in Australian medical colleges accreditation requirements as they pertain to health libraries. The recommended accreditation standard developed in this study provides a benchmark for training providers that will ensure consistency of access to high-quality library collections, services and spaces for all medical trainees. Accreditation standards from 52 medical colleges and associations supporting Australian medical training programs were reviewed. Information extracted from accreditation documents was entered into a working text spreadsheet. Data was organized under three key categories: Collections, Services and Space. Additional categories were added to record the use of the noun Library and expectations for journal access. A data extraction tool was created in Microsoft Excel to note the requirements of each provider for libraries and collections, services and spaces. The results of the content analysis highlight a lack of consistency in accreditation providers’ expectations for library collections, services and spaces. Most providers (87% n = 45) required host organizations to provide access to collections. Requirements for library space were mandated by 54% of providers (n = 28). Less than 50% of providers (n = 22) specified library services as requirements. This content analysis highlights the role of health libraries in supporting medical education, research and evidence-based practice. It also reinforces the need for improved specificity, consistency and clarity in accreditation requirements for health libraries in post-graduate medical training. The recommended benchmark accreditation standard developed in this study is a step toward addressing these issues and ensuring equity of access to library services and facilities for all medical trainees in Australia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2024.2395759
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52547
Type: Article
Subjects: medical education
libraries
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Review article (e.g. literature review, narrative review)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Oct 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.