Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52660
Title: What is the safe observation period for image-guided percutaneous liver biopsies?
Authors: Sehgal K.;Taylor F.;Van Wees M.;Li K.;De Boo D.W.;Slater L.A.
Monash Health Department(s): Radiology
Institution: (Sehgal, Taylor, Van Wees, Li, De Boo, Slater) Department of Radiology, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd, Melbourne, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
(De Boo, Slater) Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 24-Oct-2024
Copyright year: 2024
Publisher: Springer
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 47(10) (pp 1327-1334), 2024. Date of Publication: October 2024.
Journal: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Abstract: Purpose: Current observation period post-liver biopsy is typically 4 h. This study investigates the safety of reducing the observation period after percutaneous liver biopsy. Method(s): Patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in the Radiology Department of a tertiary centre were included in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. Patient demographics, procedure details and complication data were collected from the electronic medical records. Complications were graded according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification. Conditional survival probabilities were calculated for the 4-h observation period. Result(s): Among 1125 patients, 275 complications were seen; 255 grade 1, 15 grade 2 and five grade 3. Post-procedural pain represented 93% (256) of complications, whereas post-procedural haemorrhage occurred in 17 (6%) patients: 13 were of grade 2 severity requiring prolonged observation, and 4 were of grade 3 severity. Of these grade 3 complications, two required blood transfusion whereas two required embolization. A total of 215 (78%) complications occurred within 1 h, 244 (89%) within 2 h of observation. 16 (94%) of 17 post-procedural haemorrhages occurred within 2 h post-biopsy. If complication-free after 2 h, the probability of experiencing a complication within the next 2 h was 4%. Conclusion(s): The majority of complications were identified within 2 h of observation. Complications recognised after this period were largely pain-related, with only one grade 3 complication seen (post-procedural haemorrhage).Our findings suggest 2 h of post-procedural observation may be safe. Level of Evidence: Level 2B, Retrospective Cohort Study. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.).Copyright © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2024.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03800-2
PubMed URL: 39078495 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=39078495]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52660
Type: Article
Subjects: angiography
anticoagulant therapy
artificial embolization
bacteremia
blood transfusion
image guided biopsy
liver biopsy
pneumothorax
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.