Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52891
Conference/Presentation Title: Evaluating the impact of a tertiary multidisciplinary meeting in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study.
Authors: Sasse B.;Shaya S.;Nimmo J.;Cao K.;Day D. ;Evans K.;Healy C.;Ho G.-Y.;Kruss G. ;McCartney A. ;Mojzisova L.;Srivastava R.;Tan J.;Tan M.Y.;Webber K. ;White M. ;David S. ;Harris M. 
Monash Health Department(s): Oncology
Institution: (Sasse, Shaya, Nimmo, Cao, Day, Evans, Healy, Ho, Kruss, McCartney, Mojzisova, Srivastava, Webber, White, Harris) Monash Health Breast Oncology, 823-865 Centre Rd, Bentleigh East, VIC 3165, Australia
(Day, Ho, Kruss, McCartney, Srivastava, White, Harris) Monash University, Department of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, VIC, Australia
(Tan, Tan, David) Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(David) The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Presentation/Conference Date: 23-Dec-2024
Copyright year: 2025
Publisher: Churchill Livingstone
Publication information: Breast. 79(no pagination), 2025. Article Number: 103861. Date of Publication: February 2025.
Journal: Breast
Abstract: Background: Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) guidelines recommend multidisciplinary meetings (MDM), but there is limited research on their impact. This prospective study examines the impact of an mBC MDM on management plans, their implementation rate, and costs and benefits at an Australian metropolitan breast cancer center. Method(s): Consecutive mBC MDM patients were enrolled. Oncologists recorded their management plans before the MDM. Following the MDM, consensus plan was recorded and compared to the pre-MDM plan. Plans were categorised as no change, low impact, or high impact. High impact was defined as major treatment change or trial referral. Plan implementation was assessed four months post-MDM. Co-primary endpoints were proportion of plans changed pre/post-MDM and the proportion of high vs. low-impact changes. Estimates of time spent on the MDM and time savings were collected. Result(s): 114 MDM presentations for 95 patients were recorded from October 2023 to July 2024. 65 (57.0 %) presentations resulted in a plan change (p < 0.001); 32 (28.1 %) were high impact (p < 0.001). Follow up data was collected for 77 presentations; 65 (84.4 %) were fully implemented. 42 presentations resulted in high impact recommendations, of which 39 were implemented (92.6 %) (p = 0.005). The MDM earned $571.18/week with estimated costs of $1584.63, a $1013.45 deficit. Costs were likely offset by estimated savings from improved clinic efficiencies. Conclusion(s): MBC MDMs result in significant, actionable changes to patient management. 28.1 % of presentations resulted in treatment changes, almost all of which were implemented. Costs were offset by improved clinic efficiencies. MBC MDMs enhance care in this diverse patient population.Copyright © 2024
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103861
PubMed URL: 39701012 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=39701012]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52891
Type: Conference Paper
Subjects: breast cancer
oncologist
palliative therapy
Appears in Collections:Conferences

Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Feb 11, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.