Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52960
Title: Enhancing teamwork in higher education: experiences of podiatry students using sparkplus for self- and peer-assessment in group work.
Authors: Kaminski M.R.;Raspovic A.;Munteanu S.E.
Monash Health Department(s): Podiatry
Allied Health
Institution: (Kaminski, Raspovic, Munteanu) Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(Kaminski) Department of Podiatry, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(Kaminski) School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 28-Nov-2024
Copyright year: 2024
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 17(4) (pp e70010), 2024. Date of Publication: 01 Dec 2024.
Journal: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Teamwork is essential for delivering high-quality healthcare, particularly given the increasing complexity of care due to chronic diseases, comorbidities and limited resources. The necessary skills and attributes for effective teamwork are often taught and assessed through group work within healthcare education programs. While group work can assist the development of skills and attributes of students to be effective team members, it also presents challenges, such as ensuring equitable student contributions. The Self and Peer Assessment Resource Kit (SPARKPLUS) endeavours to increase transparency, address inequities and provide learning-oriented feedback in group work. However, there is limited evidence on its utility within university health education. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the experiences of podiatry students who used SPARKPLUS for self-evaluation and peer review during group work. METHOD(S): Undergraduate podiatry students (n = 102) enrolled in a fourth-year (final year) project-based subject provided self- and peer-assessment ratings for two group assessment tasks using SPARKPLUS. Eleven students (10.8%) participated in semi-structured focus groups, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted by two independent reviewers. RESULT(S): Four overarching themes and 11 subthemes were identified: (i) Performance (1a. Equity; 1b. Accountability), (ii) Peer inter-relationships (2a. Social dynamics; 2b. Fear of consequences), (iii) Feedback and reflection (3a. Self-reflection; 3b. Receiving and responding to feedback; 3c. Supervisor action; 3d. Avoiding confrontation) and (iv) Utility (4a. Enablers; 4b. Barriers; 4c. Integration throughout course). CONCLUSION(S): Overall, SPARKPLUS encouraged equity, accountability and self-reflection among group members. There was perceived risk of negative group dynamics and relationships when poor feedback was given. It was equivocal if team member contributions increased. Self- and peer-assessment with SPARKPLUS is a useful approach towards addressing inequities in group work within health education and may offer insight into the development and assessment of teamwork capabilities.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Foot and Ankle Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Podiatry Association and The Royal College of Podiatry.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70010
PubMed URL: 39558623 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=39558623]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52960
Type: Article
Subjects: education
medical education
podiatry
psychology
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Feb 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.