Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/53725
Title: | Refining the abdominal wall perforasome with clinical application. | Authors: | Meyerov J.;Ram R.;Grinsell D. | Monash Health Department(s): | General Surgery | Institution: | (Meyerov, Grinsell) Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Ram) Department of Surgery, Monash University, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Issue Date: | 8-May-2025 | Copyright year: | 2025 | Publisher: | Churchill Livingstone | Place of publication: | United Kingdom | Publication information: | Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 105(pp 283-291), 2025. Date of Publication: 01 Jun 2025. | Journal: | Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery | Abstract: | Background and purpose: Perforator selection is critical during operative planning for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical variations in deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforators and their primary subcutaneous branching patterns within the perforasome, using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (CTA) to develop a new nomenclature system. Method(s): Abdominal CTA scans of 180 patients undergoing preoperative imaging for DIEP flap reconstruction were evaluated. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume-rendering technique (VRT) reconstructions were used to map perforator anatomy. Branching patterns were correlated to the location and subcutaneous course of the perforators, at emergence from the anterior rectus sheath. Result(s): Perforators were classified into 3 main categories and further sub-classified based on the orientation of tributaries. Type I perforators were the most common (87.2%) and coursed as a single trunk (IA) or bifurcated with an internal angle <=30degree (IB). Type II perforators (7.5%) bifurcated at 180 +/- 20degree (IIA) or between 30degree and 160degree (IIB). Type III perforators (5.3%) produced 3 or more primary branches. On an average, there were 2.9 +/- 1.6 perforators per hemi-abdomen. Larger caliber vessels were found closer to the umbilicus (P < 0.005). Most perforators (80.5%) exited the rectus sheath caudal to the umbilicus and coursed in an inferolateral direction. Conclusion(s): This study provides a novel classification of the primary subcutaneous perforasome branching patterns of DIEA perforators and highlights the clinical implications for improved flap design and operative outcomes.Copyright © 2025 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.024 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/53725 | Type: | Article | Subjects: | abdominal wall anatomical variation breast reconstruction |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey) |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.