Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57885
Title: Prognostic value of KRAS gene mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Croagh D. ;Aslani S.;Lee B.;Strickland A.H.;Shen H.
Monash Health Department(s): Monash University - School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health
Oncology
Institution: (Aslani, Shen, Croagh) Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Australia

(Lee) Personalised Oncology Division, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, Australia

(Lee) Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia

(Lee) Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, Epping, Australia

(Lee) Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

(Strickland) Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia

(Strickland) Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Issue Date: 21-Mar-2026
Copyright year: 2026
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 61(3) (pp 352-362), 2026. Date of Publication: 2026.
Journal: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Abstract: Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between distinct KRAS mutations and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Method(s): A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases to identify studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS associated with key KRAS mutations (G12D, G12R, and G12V) in PDAC patients, from inception until January 2025. Subgroup analyses were carried out based on disease stage (resectable and borderline resectable as early-stage disease and locally advanced and metastatic as late-stage disease) and treatment approaches (operation, chemotherapy, or combination of both). KRAS: G12D mutation was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.28-1.99, p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis, G12D mutation was significantly associated with poor OS in those receiving chemotherapy (HR = 1.29, 95%CI: 1.18-1.39, p < 0.05) and in those with late-stage disease (HR = 1.29, 95%CI: 1.18-1.39, p < 0.05). G12R was significantly associated with improved OS in patients receiving chemotherapy (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.99, p = 0.042). G12V had a significant association with improved OS in patients with early-stage disease (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52-0.86, p = 0.002). Conclusion(s): The study highlights the heterogeneous prognostic impact of KRAS mutations in PDAC. These findings suggest that the prognostic relevance of KRAS mutations in PDAC may depend on clinical factors such as treatment modality and disease stage.Copyright © 2026 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2610630
PubMed URL: 41527990
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57885
Type: Review
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on May 26, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.