Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57933
Conference/Presentation Title: Comparative genomic, histological and biomechanical assessment of human fascia lata versus polypropylene mesh.
Authors: Hennes D.;Mukherjee S.;Rosamilia A.;Werkmeister J.;Gargett C.;Buckley V.;Bidkhori H.;Paul K.;Darzi S.
Monash Health Department(s): Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Monash Women's)
Institution: (Hennes) Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

(Hennes, Darzi, Paul, Bidkhori, Gargett, Werkmeister, Mukherjee) Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Australia

(Darzi, Paul, Bidkhori, Gargett, Werkmeister, Mukherjee) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

(Buckley, Rosamilia) Pelvic Floor Unit, Monash Health, Moorabbin, Australia
Presentation/Conference Date: 19-Mar-2026
Copyright year: 2026
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc
Conference location: Netherlands
Publication information: BJU International. Conference: 78th Annual Scientific Meeting of Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand, USANZ 2026. Melbourne, VIC Australia. 137(Supplement 2) (pp S57-S59), 2026. Date of Publication: 01 Feb 2026.
Journal: BJU International
Abstract: Introduction & Objectives: The global withdrawal of transvaginal polypropylene mesh due to safety concerns has prompted the need for effective, biocompatible alternatives in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Human fascia lata (HFL), an autologous graft, has been used in anti-incontinence procedures and is increasingly explored for prolapse repair. This preclinical study compares HFL to polypropylene mesh, evaluating mechanical properties, host immune response, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling. Method(s): Fascial grafts were harvested from 26 female patients undergoing autologous sling or sacrocolpopexy procedures, with informed consent and ethical approval (protocol #01-01-09-22). Mechanical strength was measured via cyclic uniaxial loading (100% stretch, three cycles) followed by failure testing. An in vivo abdominal implantation model in C57BL/6 mice (n = 8 per group per time point) assessed host response at 7 and 90 days. Explants underwent histology (H&E, Masson's trichrome, elastin), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and polarised imaging for collagen organisation. Gene expression and immune profiling were performed via qPCR and single-cell proteomics targeting macrophage activation, angiogenesis, and ECM markers. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Result(s): By day 7, HFL grafts showed rapid neovascularization and cellular infiltration, while polypropylene mesh triggered acute neutrophilic inflammation and foreign body giant cells. HFL retained 50% of its tensile strength post-cyclic loading versus 13% in polypropylene (P < 0.01). Polarised imaging revealed loosely organised collagen III in HFL explants, indicative of active remodelling, while polypropylene showed dense, aligned fibres. SEM confirmed preserved fibrous architecture in HFL at 90 days with no erosions. qPCR revealed increased expression of neovascular and ECM markers (CD90, CD31, CD38, Tgfb1, Tgfbr1, Timp2, Mmp3, Mmp9) and a balanced M1/M2 macrophage response, supporting favourable tissue integration (Fig. 2). Conclusion(s): HFL exhibits superior biomechanical resilience and host integration compared to polypropylene mesh. Its collagen-rich matrix promotes tissue remodelling and reduces adverse immune responses, making it a promising autologous alternative for pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence surgery. Further clinical validation is warranted.
Conference Name: 78th Annual Scientific Meeting of Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand, USANZ 2026
Conference Start Date: 2026-02-28
Conference End Date: 2026-03-03
Conference Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.70141
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57933
Type: Conference Abstract
Appears in Collections:Conference Abstracts

Show full item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on May 26, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.