Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/61395
Title: Diagnostic Accuracy and Feasibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio at Low Frame Rate Angiography: The Prospective Multicentre Australian AVALON Study.
Authors: O'Brien J.M.;Zhang M.;Ford T.J.;Psaltis P.J.;Marathe J.A.;Ravindran J.;Rehan R.;Tripathi V.;Redwood E.;Easey K.;Brown A.J.;Chew D.P.;Yong A.;Wong D.T.L.
Monash Health Department(s): Cardiology (MonashHeart)
Institution: (O'Brien, Zhang, Brown, Chew, Wong) Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

(O'Brien, Zhang, Tripathi, Brown, Chew, Wong) Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

(Ford, Redwood, Easey) Department of Cardiology, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia

(Ford) University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

(Psaltis, Marathe) Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia

(Psaltis, Marathe) University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

(Ravindran, Rehan, Yong) Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

(Rehan, Yong) University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, Australia
Issue Date: 12-Sep-2026
Copyright year: 2026
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. (no pagination), 2026. Date of Publication: 2026.
Journal: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract: Background: Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is a well-established, non-hyperemic, angiographic, wire-free predictor of ischemia when compared to Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). However, its diagnostic accuracy at low frame rates (< 10 frames/second), commonly used in contemporary practice to minimize radiation exposure, has not been evaluated. Aim(s): To assess the diagnostic accuracy of QFR when acquired at lower frame rates in line with contemporary practice. Method(s): The AVALON trial-a prospective, multi-center, Australian study-included patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and FFR assessment for stable coronary artery disease (CAD). QFR analysis was performed using Medis QAngio XA QFR 2.2.2.4 software. Significant QFR and FFR were defined as < 0.80. Result(s): Among 1054 patients (66.8 +/- 10.4 years, 585 males, 797 vessels), the mean FFR was 0.81 +/- 0.10, with 312 vessels (39%) classified as FFR significant. The mean QFR was 0.81 +/- 0.10, and 352 vessels (44%) were QFR significant. QFR demonstrated strong diagnostic performance in predicting significant FFR with AUC of 0.92 (p < 0.001). It exhibited sensitivity of 85%, specificity 89%, positive predictive value (PPV) 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) 90%, and diagnostic accuracy 87%. Interobserver reliability for QFR was excellent (ICC = 0.92, p < 0.001). Using the established QFR-FFR hybrid approach, where FFR was performed only if QFR ranged between 0.77 and 0.87, FFR could be safely deferred in 58% of cases, achieving a diagnostic accuracy of 93.8%. Conclusion(s): QFR remains highly accurate in predicting significant FFR, even when angiography is acquired at low frame rates. The QFR-FFR hybrid approach effectively minimizes the need for invasive FFR measurements, with the potential to enhance clinical efficiency while maintaining high diagnostic precision.Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70813
PubMed URL: John Wiley and Sons Inc
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/61395
Type: Article In Press
Subjects: adult

*angiography

article

*catheterization

coronary angiography

coronary artery disease

data analysis software

diagnosis

*diagnostic accuracy

diagnostic test accuracy study

female

*fractional flow reserve

human

hyperemia

interrater reliability

*machine learning

major clinical study

male

multicenter study

predictive value

radiation exposure
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.