Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/27568
Title: Comparison of ultrasonic shears and traditional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy: Randomized controlled trial.
Authors: Tsaltas J.;Chan K.-W.;Polyakov A.;Edwards G.N.;Najjar H.;Vollenhoven B. ;Fitz-Gerald A.L.;Tan J.
Institution: (Fitz-Gerald, Vollenhoven) Monash Medical Center/Southern Health Clayton, Australia (Tan) Hollywood Medical Center, Nedlands, Australia (Chan, Edwards, Najjar, Tsaltas) Monash Medical Centre/Southern Health Moorabbin, Australia (Polyakov) Melbourne IVF East Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 12-Nov-2013
Copyright year: 2013
Publisher: Elsevier (P.O. Box 211, Amsterdam 1000 AE, Netherlands)
Place of publication: Netherlands
Publication information: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 20 (6) (pp 853-857), 2013. Date of Publication: 2013.
Abstract: Study Objective: To compare operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative analgesia, and length of hospital stay using ultrasonic shears vs traditional suture ligature in vaginal hysterectomy. Design(s): Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting(s): Gynecology units within a single health network, university hospital. Patient(s): Forty women requiring vaginal hysterectomy because of benign disease. Intervention(s): Vaginal hysterectomy performed using either ultrasonically activated shears (USS) or traditional suture ligatures. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-one patients were randomized to the USS arm, and 19 patients to the traditional suture ligature arm. Patient characteristics were comparable. Mean (SD) hysterectomy time and was similar in both the USS and traditional arms, 28.66 (4.0) minutes vs 32.37 (3.18) minutes (p=.47), as was total operating time, 97.38 (8.9) minutes vs 91.63 (7.69) minutes (p=.63). Operative blood loss was significantly decreased in the USS group: 62.63 (12.46) mL vs 136.05 (21.54) mL (p=.006). There was, however, no significant change in hemoglobin concentration between the 2 groups: 19.53 (1.79) g/L vs -16.72 (2.5) g/L. There was no significant difference in mean oxycodone use: 9.29 (2.66) mg vs 8.06(3.19) mg (p=.77). Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups: 58.98 (3.27) hours vs 60.05 (6.48) hours (p=.88). There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between the groups. Conclusion(s): Although the Harmonic scalpel system, compared with the traditional suture ligation method, seems to be a safe alternative for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy, it offers no benefit insofar as operative time, reduction in clinically significant blood loss, and analgesic requirements. © 2013 AAGL.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.019
PubMed URL: 24183277 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=24183277]
ISSN: 1553-4650
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/27568
Type: Article
Subjects: adult
aged
article
chest infection/co [Complication]
clinical article
controlled study
female
hemoglobin determination
hemostasis
*hospitalization
human
length of stay
*operation duration
*operative blood loss
polyglactin suture
*postoperative analgesia
randomized controlled trial
*surgical technique
ureter injury/co [Complication]
urinary tract infection/co [Complication]
urine incontinence
*vaginal hysterectomy
oxycodone
*traditional suture ligature
*ultrasonic shear
*hospitalization
human
length of stay
*operation duration
*operative blood loss
polyglactin suture
*postoperative analgesia
randomized controlled trial
*surgical technique
ureter injury / complication
urinary tract infection / complication
urine incontinence
*vaginal hysterectomy
adult
article
chest infection / complication
clinical article
controlled study
female
hemoglobin determination
hemostasis
aged
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomised controlled trial
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Aug 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.