Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/31067
Title: A1C for screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice.
Authors: O'Dea K.;Shaw J.E.;Lu Z.X.;Walker K.Z.;Sikaris K.A.
Institution: (Lu, Sikaris) Melbourne Pathology Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Lu) Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Walker) Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Walker) Preventative Health Unit, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (O'Dea) Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia (Shaw) Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology Unit, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 11-Oct-2012
Copyright year: 2010
Publisher: American Diabetes Association Inc. (1701 North Beauregard St., Alexandria VA 22311, United States)
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Diabetes Care. 33 (4) (pp 817-819), 2010. Date of Publication: April 2010.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE - To evaluate A1C for screening and diagnosis of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes defined by oral glucose tolerance testing in clinical and general populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A1C cut offs (<=5.5% to rule out diabetes; >=7.0% to rule in diabetes) were derived from a clinical group (Melbourne Pathology [MP] group: n = 2,494; undiagnosed diabetes 34.6%) and then evaluated in a population-based sample (AusDiab group: n = 6,015; undiagnosed diabetes 4.6%). RESULTS - For diabetes in the MP and AusDiab groups, A1C at 5.5% gave sensitivities of 98.7 and 83.5%, while A1C at 7.0% gave specificities of 98.2 and 100%, respectively. Many (61.9-69.3%) with impaired A1C (5.6-6.9%) in both populations had abnormal glucose status. CONCLUSIONS - A1C <=5.5% and >=7.0% predicts absence or presence of type 2 diabetes, respectively, while at A1C 6.5-6.9% diabetes is highly probable in clinical and population settings. A high proportion of people with impaired A1C have abnormal glucose status requiring follow-up. © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1763
PubMed URL: 20067965 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20067965]
ISSN: 0149-5992
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/31067
Type: Article
Subjects: controlled study
diagnostic value
glucose blood level
hemoglobin determination
human
impaired glucose tolerance/di [Diagnosis]
impaired glucose tolerance/et [Etiology]
major clinical study
*non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus/di [Diagnosis]
*non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus/ep [Epidemiology]
oral glucose tolerance test
screening
sensitivity and specificity
glucose/ec [Endogenous Compound]
*hemoglobin A1c/ec [Endogenous Compound]
Australia
article
screening
sensitivity and specificity
major clinical study
impaired glucose tolerance / diagnosis / etiology
human
hemoglobin determination
article
oral glucose tolerance test
diagnostic value
controlled study
Australia
*non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus / *diagnosis / *epidemiology
glucose blood level
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Sep 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.