Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/41569
Title: The safety and feasibility of an intervention to improve balance dysfunction in ambulant adults with cerebral palsy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Authors: Pogrebnoy D.;McGinley J.;Kravtsov S. ;Morgan P.;Murphy A. ;Opheim A.
Monash Health Department(s): Physiotherapy
Allied Health
Institution: (Morgan) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia (Murphy) Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia (Opheim) Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway (Pogrebnoy) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia (Kravtsov) Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia (McGinley) Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 1-Jul-2016
Copyright year: 2015
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: Clinical rehabilitation. 29 (9) (pp 907-919), 2015. Date of Publication: 01 Sep 2015.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, feasibility and potential efficacy of balance training in adults with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: Phase 2, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation facility. SUBJECTS: A total of 17 ambulatory adults with cerebral palsy. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to an eight-week, once-weekly, small group programme of balance training, or seated attention control activity. Balance training was individually tailored using the Balance Evaluation Systems test. MAIN MEASURES: Primary focus was feasibility, addressed by recruitment, retention, adherence, and safety. Efficacy was primarily evaluated with the Ambulatory Self-Confidence Questionnaire and the Balance Evaluation Systems test, at intervention conclusion and Week 24. Secondary outcomes included gait speed, walking distance, falls efficacy, fatigue, quality of life, and global impression of change. RESULTS: Interventions were safe and feasible with no major adverse events. Adherence was high. At eight and 24 weeks, there were negligible between-group differences in Balance Evaluation systems test total. At 24 weeks, there was a small, non-significant between-group difference in favour of the balance group with effect sizes of 0.14 for ambulatory self-confidence, 0.10 for falls efficacy, and 0.12 for fatigue. There were significant between-group differences for self-reported walking confidence and balance change, in favour of the balance group at Weeks 8 and 24 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A customised balance programme is feasible and safe for ambulant adults with cerebral palsy. Small effects from balance training in selected outcomes occurred. Study replication with at least 38 participants per group to confirm efficacy is warranted.Copyright © The Author(s) 2014.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215514556299
PubMed URL: 25413169 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25413169]
ISSN: 1477-0873 (electronic)
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/41569
Type: Article
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomised controlled trial
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Jan 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.