Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51478
Title: Development of a rapid, multi-organisational, multi-modal assessment of a newly available disposable respirator.
Authors: Ng I.;Bodas C.;Roberts M.;Coe A.;Smith M.;McCann H.;Williams D.L.
Institution: (Ng, Williams) Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville 3050, Australia
(Ng, Williams) Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
(Bodas, Roberts) Respiratory Protection Program, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville 3050, Australia
(Coe) Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Australia
(Smith) Respiratory Protection Program, Albury Wodonga Health, Vermont Street, Wodonga 3690, Australia
(McCann) Respiratory Protection Program, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Australia
Issue Date: 13-Apr-2024
Copyright year: 2024
Publisher: Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
Place of publication: Australia
Publication information: Infection, Disease and Health. 29(3) (pp 124-129), 2024. Date of Publication: August 2024.
Journal: Infection, Disease and Health
Abstract: Background: A rapid large-scale evaluation of a newly available duckbill style P2/N95 respirator, the Care Essentials (CE) MSK-003, was required to determine its suitability for deployment into the Victorian healthcare service. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility of establishing a rapid, multi-organisational and multi-modal evaluation of the respirator, and to investigate whether this respirator would meet the needs of healthcare workers. Method(s): The evaluation was a collaboration among three healthcare organisations - two tertiary hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne and a rural-based hospital. Participants were healthcare workers undertaking their routine fit tests. They were required to complete quantitative fit testing and a usability assessment survey on the CE MSK-003 respirator. The a priori performance criteria were set as fit test pass rate of >70%, plus satisfactory subjective overall comfort and performance assessments, defined as a rating of adequate, good, or very good in >90% of the cohort. Result(s): A total of 1070 participants completed the multi-modal assessment within a month. Seventy-eight percent of participants passed their quantitative fit test. Over 90% of survey respondents reported that the CE MSK-003 was adequate, good or very good in terms of its overall comfort and performance assessments. Conclusion(s): We demonstrated that a multi-modal evaluation of a new respirator can be rapidly conducted with a high level of participation in a controlled, consistent manner across multiple organisations. The evaluation results of the CE MSK-003 respirator exceeded our predetermined (a priori) minimal criteria, making it suitable for broad distribution to healthcare organisations.Copyright © 2024 The Authors
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.03.002
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51478
Type: Article
Subjects: filtering facepiece respirator
respiratory protection
ventilator
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.